Obviousnesses of a fuzzy entropy necessary model

OBVIOUSNESS OF A FUZZY ENTROPY NECESSARY MODEL

Remarks of a technological nature :

Is a tool a Derived Catalyst of Fuzzy Entropy? The development of effective hunting weapons would have allowed a demographic jump of human Catalysts towards - 40 000 BC. A new jump occurred at the Neolithic transition towards - 8 000 BC, with the development of agricultural tools. At each time with a snowball effect.

After the elimination of the large carnivores, which is always lasting, see the adventures of reintroduction of some bears in the French Pyrenees, Man became his own predatory. Today, hunting weapons weigh little in the armament industry, which progressed so much that it sell individual weapons of war, light and effective, to any unit which projects to enlist child-soldiers.

For the Man, the studied model is a present snapshot. The Efficiency Factor Sf (ratio exogenous / endogenous of a system’s Kinetic Fuzzy Entropy) believed more quickly than for any other species. Probably, chimpanzees have broken nuts for hundreds of thousands of years. In a few millennia, Humanity has gone from the still used slave-tool, to the animal-tool with the invention of the yoke for the bovines, the collar for the horse (unknown in Antiquity), finally to the machine-tool. An explosion on a geological time scale.

Two indicators would show that the process accelerates:

strong persistent growth rates of some Asian countries, unequalled in the history,
returns on investment of some financial funds, with the best yields ever seen; we speak of 15%, and sometimes much more.

Would Entropy gravity be the engine of the globalization?

Today, a widespread tool and a good Derived Catalyst of Fuzzy Entropy: the conventional internal combustion engine with 67 - 80% of energy inefficiency. For the oil, if you take in account the extraction, transport, transformation while fuel and ingredients the average output falls to ~ 13% for a diesel and ~ 9,4% for a gas engine.

When such an engine is assembled on a car, with automatic box and air-conditioning:

"Through numerous, complex calculations, actual figures for loss of thermodynamic potential have been calculated in units of total kilowatt hours (kwh) per automobile. An estimate of 5000-6525kwh per automobile emerges. The estimate of the ideal thermodynamic potential requirement for producing an automobile, on the other hand, is only about 30kwh. The enormous magnitude of the gap between actual and ideal thermodynamic potential costs is striking." (ref. 32)

What is more, some of these vehicles produced at a great thermodynamic potential cost, show a remarkably bad propelling output. For example, a sport utility vehicle (SUV or 4x4) of 130 to 300cv (often "single-seater" and called tractor of Chelsea in London; in Europe 90% of them never drive off-road), or a café sport car Volks(?)wagen-Bugatti of 16cyl and 1000cv. Both are crawling downtown at an average speed lower than 20km/h. At equal speed, a consumption of 15 litres/100km represents 450 times the consumption of some experimental manned vehicles, which cover more than 3000km with 1 liter of gas.

The European market size of the "SUV" or 4x4 is increasing since years. Moreover Renault, which was not on this segment, has projects now. (ref. 63)

In manufacturers' catalogues, the power of a model often increases from year to year; it never decreases. “ ... expectations of the consumers are in contradiction with the fall of fuel consumption”. (ref. 29) At the time of a recent car show, the press noticed that the manufacturers had almost schizophrenic behaviours. They would be torn between the ecological basic tendency and the desires of always more power, more accelerations and comfort. Interesting symptom, to be continued.

The average mass of European cars increased by 20% in 15 years. The electric power of the top-of-the-range cars increased by 300% in 20 years. Engineers are working on an inboard tension of 42v which would make possible to allocate 5kW to the equipment services, and perhaps authorize air-conditioning at stop. Let us wait patiently.

A car often stops. Downtown in Europe, where 30% of the rides are shorter than the kilometre, mayors are appreciated at first, and then re-elected, for their capacity to create parking areas. In the near town, the digging of an underground car park caused the collapse of the quarter of a building, and weakened what’s left. The adjoining street, future approche to the car park, was fissured and partly prohibited. A school, located on the third side of the excavation, suffered damage and was closed. Fortunately, the catastrophe took place during night, without losses of human lives. An excavator, buried under the ruins, remained visible a long time. After much thought, the Court judged that the origin of the accident was not given. Mayor assured the shopkeepers that the digging of the underground car park would go on.

The car is part of the West life style. “Our way of life is not negotiable”, said a Western President. Except in the event of energy shortage, a ruling party cannot limit the consumption of free energy without risking a political suicide.

What to say on the propelling output of fighter type light jet planes, the new passion of private pilots, or of offshore boats, propelled by 2000hp at the speed of a 125cc bike? For the show? The spectacular pure Kinetic Fuzzy Entropy?

More modestly but everywhere in the West, amateurs improve their Catalysts’ performance by home-building their boats or planes. Currently, an efficient light aircraft have with difficulty an "evolutionary" advantage over a less good and energy greedier model. A situation that should change when progress of electronics will make the all-weathers flight equipments cheaper. The sport aircrafts will become means of transport, and the currently limited market will develop considerably. An evolution that aeronautical associations try rightly to promote.

A very good Derived Catalyst: the conventional light bulb, with 70% of total useful energy lost by heat in power generation and transmission, 27% lost by heat in the bulb, 3% left for the light

Another good Derived Catalyst, the pure electric car engine, with a battery to plug into the mains: 83% of energy inefficiency

The crushing mills of metal-bearing mines carry off the palm with an output of 1%. (ref. 41)

Who said: “Isn’t the man a stastistical animal, and it is a pity well”? This faculty, interesting for the individual, was hardly retained by the evolution, as shows the continuation.

In Europe, there has been frequent tolerance of construction, and rebuilding, on periodically flooded ground, yet charted for 200 years.

Each one seems to find its account there. The owners yield a ground, often agricultural and of little value, at an unhoped-for price. Property developers and estate agencies are busy, banks lend, and local tradesmen hope for more customers. Notaries prepare the acts without state of mind, lawyers and ushers are ready. The elected officials lead the construction to carry out their promises of local development, to show their dynamism and get more funds.

Without a word, the tax payers pay an official device of catastrophe, said to be natural. Disasters those are there less and less natural. Everywhere men are canalizing, dyking, concreting and tarring. Especially, they continue to accelerate the water run-off in the upstream basins, at the level of the piece or the way. Owners don’t like mud, or motorists aquaplaning.

Downstream precisely, the purchasing suckers, sometimes company heads, find the ground flat and rather cheap. They sign their first cheque as if signing the Declaration of Independance, while convincing themselve that the centennial flood will arrive in 99 years. More revealing, during the last disaster in the South of France where even plants were destroyed, (see the Lustucru factory near Arles, whose rebuilding was even so abandoned) a stricken owner acknowledged that he did not know he lived in a periodically flooded area.

In France, nobody speaks any more of dry weirs, on the level of the hamlet, the village or greater, only mean of regularizing the flow downstream. Yet and fortunately, our capital city is protected by the big storage dams Marne, Aube and Seine; a worry less for the provincials who regularly paddle in the basins of the Somme, the Loire, the Rhône or the Garonne.

After an important flood, a committee is quickly convened. The appropriations to be engaged are considerable, the political decisions necessarily unpopular; the solutions require a long-term supported resoluteness; only the highest authorities may decide. Paris makes promises as usual, and as usual is acting rather in the short term (“My dear compatriots! Before my election I promised strong acts to you, I will continue to promise them” - Imitator LeLuron, formerly - approximate translation).

Any committee shows easily the inconsistencies, such as, for example, the media call in urgency to German firemen and pumping equipment during the last Provencal floods. The Capital city being now few threatened, the government didn't wake up to the seriousness of the situation elsewhere. The necessary decisions being not made, committees are slowly constrained to put the file in the lower drawer and to wait for the next disaster. Except for one; funds were recently released to counter a hypothetical flood of the Seine, in Paris.

Compared with the beaver (see below), which often prefers to work in the upstream part of a river, would man show he is a better Catalyst there too? Would he produce more Fuzzy Entropy by repairing a big damage downstream?

Recently in Saxony (Germany), the damage was estimated at 10 billion euros. Sometimes, it relates to constructions on periodically flooded grounds, declared not building land under East Germany. Would East Germany have suffered from a less Efficiency Factor Sf than the West Germany?

Remark remains valid in the case of constructions:

in flammable coniferous woods around the Mediterranean Sea, and elsewhere,
on the slopes of some volcanoes; today; approximately 700 000 Neapolitans lives on the slopes of Vesuvius, (ref. 30)
close to high-risk geological faults without antiseismic precautions,
on the coasts badly protected from marine erosion, where new buildings too close to water will have a limited lifespan. When the inhabitants become aware of the risk, they beg the authorities to stabilize the littoral, enterprise sometimes difficult and expensive. In support of my thesis: "imbeciles and badly conceived coastal installations cost more than $100 billion to American taxpayers these five last years, thunders Young". (ref. 80) America always the best among Fuzzy Entropy Catalysts countries,
in the areas frequently devastated by cyclones, where the coastal levees are never high enough,
near a port in the present world confrontation. (See before)

When the roads of my village need to be repaired, administration and municipality authorize the public works companies to deposit a new layer of asphalt on the previous one. Thus, a road following the hillside was raised of 45cm in 50 years. Entrances of the houses are below the level of the bitumen, and the next large storm is awaited with apprehension. Remarkably, authorities are knowingly creating a risk area for a hitherto safe old habitat.

Why don’t we reduce significantly the road slaughter, often due to excessive speed?

In the European Med Club’s countries, the majority of drivers roll above the authorized speed limits, downtown and elsewhere, everywhere.

Public Authorities are submerged by millions of vehicles. As if they sought a possible balance between the Efficiency Factor Sf of the car-tool and the inevitable loss of human Catalysts, they defined speed limits. Unable to make them respect, they proceed no further than expensive amulets and incantations, like speed limit's panels or displays of road safety messages. “When an offence is committed, the probability of be charged is too weak ”, said a French interdepartmental road safety delegate. So a charged driver is hardly dissuaded. Rather he has the impression, at best to have drawn the bad number, in the worst case to be victim of an injustice.

Besides, let us notice the frequent leniency of the justice in this field, particularly when in front of an supposedly inextricable hank of responsibilities. (ref. 6) Between 1992 and 2002 in France, the number of administrative decisions of driving licence suspension has been divided by three (ref. 28)

To speak as an economist, are speed and accidents means to increase the Gross Domestic Product? Well, it seems that there is not enough Kinetic Fuzzy Entropy by studying and doing expensive deformable metal-frame, “high performance” tires, ABS, ESP, IPS, airbags, with micro-processors everywhere. Without speaking about the pharaonic "improvements" of the road network.

However, this same technology would easily process inboard recorders for any vehicle. Recorders are already installed (Siemens) on some company’s vehicles. Reliable and cheap, these recorders would allow the only dissuasive control, the retrospective checking.

Why don’t equip at least the faster powerful cars with recorders? A recent revealing French poll showed that a majority of people was against, even when most were sure to never drive such a car. In the name of the “last space of freedom”? Freedom to produce Fuzzy Entropy?

How to explain a rebound, the equalization effect, called in chemistry moderation law or contrariety law ? In a block if the owner or employer decides to lower the temperature of the heating water, the user will open a little more the tap of the radiators, or even buy an electric heater.

If the average kilometric cost of cars is decreasing, which happens sometimes after an energy crisis, the user will compensate by living farther from his place of work (US statistics).

The European road transport of goods uses existing road infrastructures without paying the price. It degrades them more than the other users altogether. Greedy in free energy, it has more than doubled its consumption in twenty years.

Trucks transport products of low value added on thousands of kilometres. Greek milk is conveyed in Holland, where it's transformed into yoghurt which will be sold in Spain. German potatoes cross the Alps to be washed in Italy, and return to the country by the same way.

The power of the lobby is growing and now it weighs on the governments. Interesting consequence: In France recently it obtained, by simple threats, a partial tax reduction on gas oil that is equivalent to a subsidy.

Lorries pollute heavily and their implications in accidents are increasing. How to understand that the large gauge waterway project Hamburg Köln Karlsruhe Belfort Lyon Marseille (may be Barcelona and Genoa) is interminably disputed? Even ecologists reject it, so the coast is clear to the “all by truck” for this future major economic artery of Western Europe.

How is the road transport continuing to take the advantage on the rail and inland waterway transports? In France: 1986, 54% of the market; 2006, 80%. (ref. 65)

Remarks of an economic nature :

We have given value to work, even sometimes considered as sacred. A historical recognition of our role of Catalysts? The unemployment, which deprives us of this role, would be “this terrible rest which is that of social death”. (Pierre Bourdieu)

An alive being disappears rather quickly after its reproduction period; this additional lifespan, in freewheel, is not taken into account by the evolution. (ref. 70) Except for the humanity where the prolongation is significant, particularly for the women. Our oversized brain going on, does the human Fuzzy Entropy production benefit of the seniors' cultural contributions in the artistic, philosophical, religious, scientific fields? Some also raised the beneficial role of the grandparents in the education of the children; Sf accounts perfectly for that:

continuity in the preparation of the young people to their future role of Catalysts,
better assiduity of the parents at work, especially of the mother, and increase in production of Fuzzy Entropy.

Are economic growth and Gross Domestic Product related to Kinetic Fuzzy Entropy?

Could Capital be considered as an indicator of Realized Fuzzy Entropy?

Could Cash flow be considered as an indicator of Kinetic Fuzzy Entropy?

When signing a contract of recruiting to make goods or to assume services, an employee promises to produce sufficient Kinetic Fuzzy Entropy to increase the scriptural stocks of Realized Fuzzy Entropy of his employer. In return, this one promises to give him a fraction, sometimes not easily negotiated, of these scriptural stocks. Until the payday, the employee is giving credit; he is creditor and the company is debtor.

More generally, the credit has an essential role in our modern economy; a debtor declares himself good Catalyst and promises to produce sufficient Kinetic Fuzzy Entropy to increase the scriptural stock of Realized Fuzzy Entropy of a creditor; a bet on even more Realized Fuzzy Entropy, and which, without us to astonish, was always gained statistically to date, in spite of some bubbles burstings If the credit did not exist for centuries, a small present car would probably cost the price of a light helicopter. In the Middle Ages the harness was more expensive than the horse.

May we consider clearing or merchant banks, and their environment of stock exchange specialists, like Derived Catalysts of Fuzzy Entropy? Centralizing and keeping accounts of the two preceding indicators, and others, they would accelerate circulation and treatment of the financial information.

The bank credit fits immediately in the model: banks lend money to you in exchange of a future payment. They register on your account the fiduciary sign of a fraction of their representative reserves of Realized Fuzzy Entropy. You obtain means of prolonging a Chain (see definition) by Kinetic Fuzzy Entropy. The bank counts that the exchange value of the future Realized Fuzzy Entropy will be sufficient to ensure the return on investment.

Incidentally, would the Italian Rebirth have existed without the Medici's bank? From that time, emergent artistic emotion is there as ever, even if art is now less preoccupied by the beauty. But isn't the Realized Fuzzy Entropy more obvious behind what became the "market" of art? In many Art review money appears everywhere.

Is Sf behind companies when they must continually create short lived products to lower their costs by scale economy, or perish?

Is Sf behind consumerism when, six months after the sale, only a negligible part of the material used in production is still in service? (ref. 17)

The involvement of the new technologies of information in the overall productivity is still discussed (~+2% for the best, the United States); they are currently only one Fuzzy Entropy Derived Catalyst among others, even if of great future by their function of regulation. Moreover, nobody to date saw a reduction in the number of officials. Let us notice that information technologies consume already ~10% of the world energy production.

Would the magistrates' decisions go overall in the direction of economic development; so in the one-way Kinetic Fuzzy Entropy? (Ref 61) Cases study, drawn from the column "justice" of the local today's paper:

case 1 – a delivery man, manoeuvring back his truck, crushes a 88 year old woman. He is discharged.

case 2 – A driver crushes a 87 year old man on a pedestrian crossing.. She is given a suspended prison sentence of four months, one year of suspension of licence and 200 euros of fine.

case 3 - a contractual Post office clerk steals money of customers' accounts. She is given a suspended prison sentence of six months, and a two years testing period.

case 4 - a father abuses his three children sexually. He is given a prison sentence of thirteen years, an obligation of a five years socio-legal follow-up, and a ten years suspension of civic, civil and family rights.

Is the apparent disproportion of these punishments justified? The answer is yes.

case 1 – there is homicide, but a delivery man is an effective Catalyst. He uses an energy greedy vehicle by his frequent stops, and delivers products useful for the Fuzzy Entropy Chains. His victim, octogenarian and pedestrian, could not be so effective any more.

case 2 - offence and sentence are comparable to those of case 1. The judgement of the case 1 is not fortuitous.

case 3 - an unjustified personal enrichment means a Realized Fuzzy Entropy without cause. The accused was tempted by a opportunity of Kinetic Fuzzy Entropy to which she did not have right. This right returned to customers, whose actions had led in recognized states of Fuzzy Entropy, materialized by money. Does the Collective Efficiency Factor require the continuity of the Catalysts Chains of Fuzzy Entropy? Continuity which led to the regulation of the action drive?

In societies where Fuzzy Entropy Catalysis was soon strong, did the ownership law codify the continuity of a Chain, long ago? Truism, the deprivation of his right to action would be the first cause of suffering for a prisoner.

In our example, the regrettable intrusion of a not approved Catalyst in customers' Chains, leads to a heavier punishment than if the defendant had crushed somebody..

case 4 – children get serious behavioural problems, and for life, when involved in incestuous intercourse. If the situation does not change, their future of effective Catalysts is compromised. Later, if they manage to have children, they may reproduce the paternal behaviour from which they suffered.

The Collective Catalyst would be penalized for an unpredictable duration.

Press recently noticed that paedophilia becomes the major crime.

By the way:

a suspended sentence does not decrease the Efficiency Factor Sf.
the social strata, disadvantaged by a weak Sf, are very represented in prisons.
although supposed directed by Fuzzy Entropy Field(s), Evolution tolerates offences.This objection was raised by my daughter. The recurrent problem of the Good and the Evil? Is the Fuzzy Entropic Field sometimes stronger than the rules? Among the possible models to be dug: the "dilemma of the prisoner", where the interest to cooperate is not an obviousness? (ref. 33)
in the suburbs, young French are reduced to the role of consumers (ref. 55), moreover limited. They find less work than the others and are likely less to become effective Catalysts. Do they say that they have the capacity of it by putting fire, brutal and spectacular transformation of energy? Do they attack the schools because those would guard the students more than they would form future Catalysts? Long ago, studies showed that a pupil loses his concentration after forty minutes of lesson, and less at the following hour if he's seated eight hours per day. According to OECD, the daily time spent on a school bench and the academic results are not connected. (ref. 71)

Is advertising a Derived Catalyst of Fuzzy Entropy? Let us quote the promotion of consumer credit or of expensive branded goods, now compulsory everywhere under penalty of rejection by the group. A friend of mine told me that a nephew, which he drives sometimes to the school, asks him to stop at 300 meters of the establishment, and finishes on foot. Thus, he avoids the possible redoubtable gibes on the not recent car of his uncle. A current reaction among schoolboys, since used as selling point.

Let us quote also the e-advertising and the rise of an efficient specific format: the promotional links. (ref. 58)

The price of bottled water is of two orders of magnitude higher than that of tap water, at equivalent quality. Economically incomprehensible, except if we admit an increased production of Fuzzy Entropy in packaging and diffusion for the bottled water.

In our market economy, the cost of fuel remains always below the market price, i.e. the price that buyer will agree to pay. Why?

More generally, why useful energy is so much subsidised? (ref. 23)

To grant to a city the privilege to organize Olympic Games, juicy for its companies, the Steering Committee currently asks for a security to the concerned State. This demand consolidates the application of a not written rule: privatization of the profits, nationalization of the losses. Rule accepted without much dispute by the never consulted external taxpayers.

If a comfortable return on investment is guaranteed for the concerned companies, the Committee does not guarantee that the ethical quality of the spectacle will be close to the Olympic ideal.

A triumph for Fuzzy Entropy: "I buy dustbin-bags at the supermarket; cashier gives me a plastic bag in which I put my dustbin-bags. What I am doing first when returning at home? I open the plastic bag; I take a dustbin-bag and put it in place in the dustbin; and which is the first thing that I throw to the dustbin? The plastic bag in which I had packed the dustbin-bags". All is said. (Humorist Jean François Derec - approximate translation) (Ref 62)

What to think of the Club of Rome (1968), and of its provocative voluntary “Zero Growth”? The economy of Japan stagnates, like recently that of Argentina. A “full stop landing” or a “stop and go”?

Let us remark that Collective Sf takes in account the figure of the population, and thus the fall of the birth rate in some countries, a phenomenon that affects Collective Catalyst itself.

Sometimes, robbers snatch handbag from old ladies; on average one by week in the Lyons agglomeration. Mishap that often finishes at the hospital when victim is clinging on her possession. The couturiers, sometimes called " creators " (!), (why not " alive gods "?) could show all the resources of their genius when launching the fashion of multi-pockets ladies' coats. They would gain there the gratitude of grannies and Social security. Unthinkable? Yes, they would endanger the industry of the mode accessories.

Remarks of a social nature :

Would the Fuzzy Entropy have directed the Evolution towards an increase of the Efficiency Factor Sf? Globally, would it optimize beings’ behaviors towards themselves and (or) the group? (ex: Hamilton’s alleles) Would Man have called Morals this statistical behavior optimization? Statistical, since you must take into account aggressive behaviors towards oneself or others.

Must we recognize Sf in the duality competition-cooperation of the first cells, and still today when our commensal bacteria are ten times larger than our cells?

A thermodynamic particle in a Fuzzy Entropy Field, schematized by the node of a graph, can fork by modification of the environmental parameters. (see the School of Brussels) Life also may be modified; the rate of mutation is raising in insects populations voluntarily placed under difficult conditions.

As well for humanity, if one day placed under difficult conditions by its own Collective Catalyst?

For the mankind is Sf behind the expressions "Strength through Unity" and "at them". Would empathy, compassion, altruism, love of one's neighbour or of neighbour's daughter, or the other way round aversion, resentment, fear and hate of the other, … involve common behavior, mutual aid, solidarity, co-operation, collaboration?

It’s common sense that for religions, ideologies, parties, enterprises, trades, armies and team sports, which gather for a common purpose, the result of total Sf will be better than that of, more or less, dispersed individual efforts. If they can exist, nobody will try to build an Ariane V in his garage.

Is Sf correlated with the language and writing? Writing probably appeared when economy required that the exchanges be recorded. These tools enabled us to acquire a technological culture more complex than that of the bonobos.

Is Sf correlated with strategic orientations in education for the benefit of religions, ideologies, enterprises, armies and sports? With splitting up of the tasks, specialization, breaking work down into sections, practice, continuing training?

Is a human hierarchy a Catalyst Chain of Fuzzy Entropy? The multiplier effect of the Chain would give to a link a rewarding feeling of power, even sometimes heady for the highest links. An addiction to endorphins, comparable with that of applauded artistes or marathon runners? A dominant male, (sometimes a woman) endowed often only with gestural and verbal conviction, may thus manage to carry away a group, or a nation, merely by saying what people want to hear. Even if he's promising sweat, blood and tears.

In the Christian tradition the Power is represented by the "pastor" (of souls), an exotic figure in the city centre, but which marks the perpetuation of these Entropically efficient communities. The stick of the Mesopotamian shepherd took the shape of the bishop's crook, and in our so-called individualistic society, the faithful doesn't take offence when considered like sheep.

By the way of Evolution, would Fuzzy Entropy have created the taste of Power, which ensures the duration of the Chain and makes easily admit the risks of a high rank, more exposed?

Delphine, one of my daughters-in-law, is a lawyer; she points out me that divorces are producing increasing Fuzzy Entropy:

more work for lawyers, ushers, notaries,
expensive division of the family wealth; sale of real estate,
two housings; expenses of purchase or guarantees; service charge; insurances,
the two ex-spouses are generally constrained to have a job,
an external personnel must take care of the children,
often two cars; transport charges increased by the guards of child

In the United States additional consumption was quantified to 73 billion kWh of energy and 2,76 billion m³of water for 2005. (ref. 90)

Have the Public Health services the role to optimize Collective Catalyst? Let’s leave it at that. With a son doctor and a girl at AstraZeneca in Göteborg, I will not take the risk to develop this paragraph. Let us preserve the good family feeling before all.

Are working people and retired people equal to use free energy? Would retired seniors suffer of the handicap of lower incomes, when labour force is going straight into the good Kinetic Fuzzy Entropy way and spends more, often in inessentials.? OK, “inessentials” is schmuck, especially when we know the importance of the luxury in the world economy. But Diogen would not have failed to raise the question, and my natural father, a presumed Scottish doctor, would probably agree.

So, are our societies tolerating towards our familiar poisons, alcohol and tobacco, because “hooked” people die statistically sooner?

That these untimely deaths involve for our society a load, or not, is still discussed. However, as the capital immobilized by the pensioners to ensure their security is often not very productive, showing rather Realized Fuzzy Entropy, the total capitalized mass would be thus decreased. Moreover, the more frequent transmission of the inheritance would more often start Kinetic Fuzzy Entropy. In plain language, many heirs spend part or whole of their heritage.

Would there be a more rational explanation to the governments’ difficulties to limit the damage caused by these drugs? A minister decides on measures intended to preserve public health, his colleague on production aids to preserve an economic sector:

direct aids : Europe prolonged the aids to the planters of tobacco until 2006; on the 246 billion dollars spent by the tobacco industry of the United States to avoid prosecution, 6% were allocated in fight to stop people smoking and 5% in programmes of support for the tobacco growers. (ref. 37)
indirect aids, with a strong impact on the young people, like the tacitly tolerated large media cover of F1 or motorbike pilots, now sandwich-men "de luxe" of cigarette's marks.

How to understand the media success of calls for funds intended for the treatment of diseases, rather rare and concerning especially young patients? Of course, near seven hundred annual AIDS-related deaths in France are unacceptable. On the other hand, what is done concerning older patients? Why this only resigned, and occulted, acceptance for the hundred of thousands of deaths due to alcohol and tobacco?

The general attitude appears identical with respect to the athletes, artists, brokers, businessmen, lorry drivers, students, who shorten their lives by drug taking to improve their performance. Man thinks of a phenomenon of rebound too, antagonist to the successes of medicine.

The most obvious example is that of the racing cyclists, of whom few benefit lengthily from their retirement. They are the livelihood of many: fourteen thousand people for the only caravan of the State subsidized “Tour de France”. Their veterinarians do not speak, nor the sponsors, organizers, trainers, commentators. Amazingly, their families don’t appear really concerned. Like the public, without illusions for a long time, which continues to applaud incredible feats, such as a developed power of near 450W during 20mn in a final climb, after five hours of race and three cols.

Remarks of general nature :

Initially, let us stay in the classical thermodynamic scope and say that Entropy of information (C.Shannon) and approximate Entropy (S. Pincus) rather appear in the statistical theory of the signal. In our macro-world, the output of a thermodynamic conversion cannot be equal to 1, whereas we may admit a transmission output of 1 if a message, for example "attention!", was correctly received. The word inf-Entropy or i-Entropy would raise original ambiguity by indicating that we are talking about another scientific field; even if researchers as R. C. Dewar tend towards the unification by using it to model traditional thermodynamics.

Free enthalpy and its allowed assimilation with a thermodynamic potential call the concept of field. We may tumble down a stepladder; if we are sober, we don’t see some finality in this gag. We think, later, that this quick evolution of our co-ordinates and our moments is due to something whose "field of gravity", or “inertia in a curved space”, are models. Models that don’t take account of the thermodynamic effects, and should be supplemented to specify the temporal evolution of a particle. (ref. 24)

Can the cellular automats of J. Conway, S. Wolfram or C. Langton function, without a pen or the electomagnetic fields of their computers? In biology, enzymes explore millions configurations a second, and find the good one. (ref. 27) What makes pass from a complexion to another? Do the known potentials modelize the phenomenon satisfactorily?

With a thought for Einstein, what is throwing the dice?

What to say on the appearance of the membrane-shelter of the future miraculous cellular mini-factory, on the surprising costly passage to the powerful chemistry of oxygen, or the arrival of endotherm animals, then of all-terrain and all-weather efficient homeotherms?

New fields, when researchers try desperately to restrict the admitted fields number? Yet, they encounter difficulties in statistical mechanics of the Nonequilibrium. Cosmologists say that ordinary materia represents ~ 5% of the materia of the Universe, an unknown black materia ~ 25% and a more enigmatic black energy ~ 70%; and they still don’t dispose of any model of the Black Hole.

Sometimes, we have not a unique model for a phenomenon, thus in the flow models of the wing’s aerodynamics (and cf the 6th problem of Hilbert on the kinetic theory of gasses). Is even the conventional logic, with excluded third, compatible with the fuzzy logic? Is the energy transformation following the use of fuzzy logic very different from that obtained by traditional logic? For example: the control of the subway of Sendaï.

Would Fuzzy Entropic Fields be the answer to the Kantian philosophical question of the surprising adequacy of mathematics with the Reality, more precisely currently with technology and energy conversion? Would they have directed the Evolution towards usefulness, and selected mental diagrams, which mathematicians and physicists would unknowingly reproduce in clear on paper? See the lambda-calculation of A. Church, correspondence of Curry-Howard and work of J. L. Krivine. An assumption that gives a chance to the chords theorists in their search for a proof. Thus, the positon was discovered a long time after the acknowledgment of an embarrassing negative energy in Paul Dirac's formulations; he would then have said: "My equations were smarter than I was". (ref. 72) Incidentally, let us notice the significant consequences of a quantum physics model, interpreted in today obsolete terms of particles.

By induction, let us apply this assumption in the world of art: directing the Evolution, would Fuzzy Entropy select the mental diagrams that the artist, traditionally speaking of sudden inspiration, reproduces in his favourite field of expression? Mental diagrams that his public does recognize with emotion and that gather?

The scientific spirit rallies grudgingly round the agnostic model. In spite of the decline of the Bourbakist absolute, it works hard to overstep the limit that philosophy, epistemology, semiotics and Gödel imposed long time ago.

There too, would the Fuzzy Entropy account for the scientific behaviour, that occults the obviousness of a without end reseach, and sometimes knowingly, privileges the gratifying feeling of action?

The religious belief, for example, is accompanying the pilgrim in his walking towards a sanctuary; did Evolution give to the scientific researcher a conviction that accompanies him in his thought process? Polemical topic (T. Kuhn) that an amateur may consider more serenely; having no credit with the recognized scientists, he cannot lose it.

There too, is the peripheral reason concealed by a threshold effect? Cf the page "Philosophical Presuppositions". Modestly, a personal example: I have usually the conviction of the reality of the Entropy Catalysis whereas to date, the entourage put aside, nobody let me know that he adheres to this idea.

Thus, Einstein and Oppenheimer could only underestimate a parameter more significant today, the development consequences of a hugely powerful bomb. They will have to live with these consequences, but later; at the end of their life. Einstein regretted not to have chosen to be a plumber. It's a general effect: a many physicists and especially of mathematicians, admist with difficulty that their research, apparently far from reality, probably will a day have Fuzzy Entropy repercussions, not necessarily in conformity with their ethics.. Even today where the hindsight reveals us the obviousness, a researcher of very high level in quantum physics, tries to take refuge behind his ingenuous thirst for knowledge. He does not want to hear about the possible consequence of his work, a material, a revolutionary computer that the Pentagon, inter alia, waits impatiently. (ref. 84)

Anyway, the results are there. The quantum theory leads quickly to nuclear energy and the innumerable applications of electronics and nanotechnologies. Biology led to the biotech, which revolutionizes agriculture and medicine, in spite of various reactions. Cosmology gave up the model of the big hen which lays the sun each morning; it initiated the construction of observatories, the launching of space probes and spacecrafts, the growth of space communications and imagery. It even proposes to deviate one day the trajectories of meteorites or comets that would endanger the Earth.

Is its capacity of Kinetic Fuzzy Entropy the present touchstone of any model, from quantum to cosmic?

Reciprocally, would the response to the Kantian interrogation be that our knowledge of the world is definitively limited to the only data necessary for Fuzzy Entropy production?

Is a Fuzzy Entropic Field more mysterious than Gravity Field to the contemporaries of Newton? Amazingly, at that time French scientists knew the notion of pressure (Pascal), but admitted the Newtonian notion of force with difficulty. A force, at times without a material support, was something esoteric, with a smell of … alchemy. Newton himself was not fully satisfied, and took refuge behind the mystery of God’s thought.

Slowly but surely, the highly no intuitive concept of Entropy, or perhaps Fuzzy Entropy, will become common knowledge. Then our descendants will find odd that we could degrade so much useful energy with such a bad efficiency, without us to question. My Mirage burned 240 litre/minute of kerosene at Mach 2.

To answer the discomfort expressed by some, the apparently hard deterministic aspect of a Field of Fuzzy Entropy should not inspire individually more pessimism or optimism than a field of gravity. Determinism is only one of our models, approximate and fragmentary, in which we apply an unknowable reality after a fashion. Up to now, it did not help us to clarify the emergence.

Gravity is the motor of a glider, but between the same points of separation from the towplane and the inescapable landing, two pilots will follow different trajectories, satisfying or disappointing. Between the starting place and the inevitable arrival, a snowboarder will fall and the other not; the emergent pleasure of surfing will be suddenly stopped, or not.

At the macroscopic scale, we will admit that the deterministic model is our best creation tool of Fuzzy Entropy. At the individual level, if the thought precedes and directs action, dogma however currently under discussion (see before), let us admit that the reassuring model of free will remains applicable; or if you prefer but heavier to carry, regard you as a random phenomenon, what is then exactly you when you toss a coin. If you have a tidy amount, you may choose between a luxury car or a construction on a periodically flooded ground (to simplify), with a final balance sheet Fuzzy Entropically comparable.

Today the unit of entropy does not have a name. Hasten us to propose: jod, for Joule.K^-1.

All these remarks give an inventory of fixtures, without the usual advice: "do this or that, if you want to save the planet". Advice not easily taken, as long as we will not be aware of our strong efficiency of Fuzzy Entropy Catalysts, as if our species was programmed to transform much noble energy in a not very usable heat.

To consider a restriction of the energy worldwide consumptionf proves to be utopian. To switch off the light is advised when leaving a room, which saves 100W; your neighbour has just bought a SUV of 100 000W and will make a return journey of 1000km to see the Monaco Grand Prix.

A sustainable growth will be guaranteed only by allocating always more energy to mitigate its undesirable consequences. The ecotaxe, recently appeared in advertising, remains tiny, for example € 0,25 for a fryer of € 49,99; you can bet that this participation will increase. If the curve of consumption of this reserved energy share takes an exponential form, our species must worry; except if we develop a cheap geo-engineering or if we obtain a bridging loan for terraform the planet Mars. As an example, probably pessimist, it would be instructive to compare the energy consumption in our local rubbish treatment with the corresponding energy converted yesterday by our forefathers.

I begin to feel compassion for the participants of the environmental High Masses. Climatologists, zoologists, entomologists, agronomists, doctors, I forget some, each specialist exposes gloomy prospects in his narrow branch. Reinforced by the safeguard (?) of the ozone layer and without seeing the main obstacle, our nature (what’s bred in the bone will come out in the flesh), each one, in his corner, advances solutions that the Collective Catalyst is not yet ready to adopt. Of course, these gatherings of 15 000 delegates and as many police officers cannot avoid the paradox, the detrimental consequences of their own Fuzzy Entropy production, of which some tons of CO² ; but for the good cause.

For us, to be classified in the tools of Entropy, even if efficient, is not more gratifying than to have been classified in the primates not long ago. A factor that is likely to slow down the diffusion of this study. For a long time already, Man did not cease stepping down from his self-pedestal and to comfort him let us quote G. Hegel: “peoples and individuals seek and obtain their own good in their efficient vitality, but at the same time they are the means and the instruments of a higher thing, vaster, that they don't know and that they achieve unconsciously”. (ref. 73)

Could conventional thermodynamics, monument of a great formal beauty, clarify the previous commonplace remarks? Do these simple observations show that the ”emergence” of a probably omnipresent “Fuzzentropy”, or of a similar concept, is inevitable?

One day, will this thesis be operative for a sustainable development, “instrumental” if this word loses its philosophical pejorative connotation? Let us be persuaded that to give it a stronger mathematical base will be urgent soon.

For the near future, let us hope that this Fuzzentropy model will be predictive, falsifiable, and satisfy a statistically signifiant part of the scholars, in a defined field and for an unpredictable duration. (see before)

Then, perhaps we will name it Total Entropy.

Remarks in form of conclusion :

Did the Earth offer already, a few billion years ago a Fuzzy Entropic Potential? Was Life a mean, among others, of increasing this potential? Initially not very “Fuzzentropically” (argh !) efficient, Life progressed while reaching improbable stages, always in the direction of an increasing Fuzzy Entropy production.

The Evolution equipped the grampus with an astonishing brain but not with the hand, and equipped the mole with the hand but with a limited brain. The Entropy gravity and the chance gave the primates the complementarity of the brain and the hand ...

Today, after the vegetable photosynthesis, animal synthesis of ATP and fruitful industrial synthesis of ammonia, Haber-Bosch process, Life is reaching the nuclear fusion.